Kristen Stewart: Leading by Example? Oh, yeah, you better believe she is!

When I went on wordpress this morning, the first thing I saw was a headline that said:  Kristen Stewart: Leading by Example?  Now I  can honestly say, that the title intrigued me. “Finally!”  I thought.  So, I clicked on the link to read the article.  To my great dismay, once again, it was another article with basically nothing nice to say and all kinds of advice about how she should handle herself in the public light.

Not only was the girl hobbling up to the microphone, but she was also sporting bruises and a mane that looked like it hadn’t been brushed in about a week (seriously…can’t you afford a stylist to fix your hair?!). I really could have sworn she had just come out of her slumber in her coffin and downed a handle of vodka right before arriving at the awards ceremony. The monotone actress matched her physical appearance with her facial expression (notice I say it singularly) and tone of voice as she read off the nominees……

While Stewart had an excuse for her hobbling, I believe that the injury does not negate her appearance, nor her overall attitude. I mean, come on now, you are being seen by BILLIONS of people at this very moment, and you know it. Put a genuine smile on your face and look your best given the circumstances. And for heaven’s sake, you have the money to order your stylist to make you look fabulous!!!!

Kristen is a shining example of what NOT to do. Whether you are looking for a job/promotion or searching for a relationship, you should always make sure to go through the following mental checklist (which she apparently could have used last night):…..

This “expert” goes on to give advice including:

  • Make sure your makeup is on point  (check)
  • Wear something professional (I suppose in this case she should have said appropriate for the situation)  (check)
  • Comb your hair  (check)–Kristen has a stylist that does her hair–do you honestly think that Kristen does her own hair?
  • Check your teeth for stray food (check)
  • Use your resources (check)

ccady2012 also suggests that Kristen could have “easily asked someone to cover for her and avoided all of the scrutiny.”  ARE YOU KIDDING ME?????????????????

Please feel free to comment on this person’s “insightful” (sarcasm intended) article at:  http://multiviewblogs.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/kristen-stewart-leading-by-example/

I hate to use Us Weekly as a source, but at least this time they actually used credited quotes.

 “She had sliced her foot and everyone was worrying about would she wear heels or flats or one heel, crutches or no crutches,” manicurist Ashlie Johnson told Us. “She tried so many options, she was really a trouper.”

“Kristen was nervous about her crutches so having her friends around playing music was just what she needed,” hairstylist Danilo said. “We all were trying to make her feel better and her friends were trying to tell her she’d be fine, she has insecurities about being in front of people so today was even tougher.”

I love Kristen Stewart.  I love that she is one of the most amazing young women of our time.  She marches to the beat of her own drum—ignoring the fact that there are so many who speak against her.  She is beautiful.  She is intelligent.  She is kind.  She doesn’t say ugly things about other people.  She’s kind to animals.  She is a NICE person!  She does her job despite the fact that she may have a physical injury.  She shows up, despite the fact that she doesn’t know what will greet her.  She shows up in spite of the fact that she does knows what she will endure even under the best of circumstances.

Last night was a perfect example of a young woman doing what is expected of her—not because she wanted to for publicity, not because she was feeling the need to get out and be seen, and certainly not because she was feeling her best physically.  She showed up and let them yell at her and scream at her to turn this way or that, smile, and all the other things that the photographers scream to get a starlet’s attention.  (And these are the reputable ones.)  Kristen is really not the starlet that wants to get out and promote herself.  She is introverted and would probably rather have a tooth pulled than to show up at these functions.  She can’t go anywhere or do anything without being photographed and discussed.  She was in pain because of her injury…but she showed up.  She didn’t bow out and say she couldn’t do it.  She lived up to a commitment she had made!  This young lady is in the middle of a nightmare.  It seems there is absolutely NOTHING she can do to please the haters.  If she had called and said she couldn’t come because of her foot, then there would have been a firestorm about how she was using it as an excuse to not appear in public.  She shows up to do her job and she gets insults for using (and not using) her crutches and accused of using her injury for PR.   She didn’t smile, she didn’t fix her hair, she talks in a monotone—all complaints that have been voiced about her appearance last night.

Do you notice, however, that all of the people that are out there saying all of these ugly things, were not up there presenting an Oscar?  They are not the ones that are in the spotlight? They are not the ones put in the bulls eye for every asshole that wants to take a pot shot.   It is easy for them to sit in their offices in their cozy little chairs and moan and groan–complain and give advice.  But the fact of the matter is, they don’t know “sh*t” about what is going on in the life of this young woman.  Who are they to sit in judgement?  Who died and left them with the title of “Critic of the Day”?  What leads them to think that they have ANY right to say anything about what this young woman should or shouldn’t have done?

In the case of  ccady2012 above, I suspect that her company has a blog and that everyone in the company is supposed to write an article as part of their job description.  Well, she wrote her blog and made a complete ass out of herself.  If she had just given suggestions as to how to prepare to go to a job interview or to meet someone for the first time, then she would have had a legitimate article.  But, to attempt to link to Kristen Stewart and to have the audacity to offer advice to her is outrageous.

Now the truth of the matter is, that there will be very few people that see the article this ccady2012  woman wrote.  But there are a lot of other people out there taking the same kind of  aim at Kristen, with no more insight or legitimate right than she had.

Is Kristen Stewart leading by example?  Hell, yes she is!  An admirable, hold your head high and let them eat shit kind of example.  I’m proud of her!  And more power to her!

There is an old saying, “If you don’t have something nice to say about someone, don’t say anything at all.”

There is another saying that says, “People who live in glass houses, shouldn’t throw stones.”

So unless you have NO faults and have NOTHING you could do better, KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT!!!

Staged, Blackmailed, Photoshopped or PR….THIS Is the Reality

kristen-stewart-robert-pattinson-gossip-tabloid-journalism

See the article by Andre Soares  at ALT Film Guide

OMG HOLLYWOOD LIES IS AT IT AGAIN

by twilighter

Hollywood Lies is like a blogger’s dream. They are so over the top that making them, AND THE PEOPLE THAT BELIEVE THEIR CRAP, look stupid is embarrassingly easy.  Here’s a comment I attached to Chris Rogers article today at the HL website: Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart Are Moving To Paris — Report. They are so desperate for comments at HL that they even leave my comment insulting HL up. A copy of the “article” follows so that you don’t have to reward them with a webhit.  Here goes:

Comment by twilighter:Well if it isn’t another Face of the Celebrity Gossip Machine, Christopher Rogers, who was featured at justiceforkristen.wordpress.com back in October when he mangled simple temporal terms like “after”, “since”, “before”, and “latest” in fabricating an article entitled Kristen Stewart: ‘I Have Nothing To Be Ashamed Of’ After Affair” out of multiple pieces of tabloid excrement.

Gee Chris, didn’t you and fellow misfit editors and writers at Hollywood Lies take a enough of a beating yesterday after Bonnie Fuller’s love advice article Kristen Stewart: Follow Robert Pattinson To Australia To Save Your Love went down in flames?  Apparently not.  We are beginning to think you are enjoying it.

As we said yesterday Chris, we are having serious “trust issues” with Bonnie and the staff of Hollywood Lies, but our hopes of a reconciliation are dependent on her and you following through on that Stay to the Truth Plan we talked about.  And just in case you may have forgotten it (we know you are all a little slow over there at HL), maybe it bares (and I don’t mean the dog spelled B-E-A-R) repeating.  So here goes:

“The Keep to the Truth Plan

1.    Stop claiming that you have unnamed, unidentified sources that so-calledly knows something about Rob & Kristen and their lives.
2.    Stop letting your editors make up stories about them from half-truths and misquotes.
3.    Fire all of your current so-called editors and reporters as they are totally pathetic.
4.    Stop citing other celebrity gossip websites for their lies, thus perpetuating the nonsense.
5.    Respect the privacy of actors who expressly want to be left alone.
6.    Stop feeding the beast and making people stupid with your endless drivel.

And finally, stop referring to this so-called “cheating scandal” as we know it was all staged. For starters, read the Grand Punk series at justiceforkristen.wordpress.com. It should be required reading for you and your staff.

If you carry through on this plan, maybe, but I doubt it, we will start getting over our “trust issues” with you and your website.”

Let’s see how you and Bonnie are doing with our little plan based on your article from today:

1.    Hmm, started with a poorly photoshopped photo of Rob and Kristen at the Eiffel Tower.  Not a Good Start.    FAIL

2.    Then proceeded with a misleading headline.  Stated they were moving when the house hunt hasn’t even started.  FAIL

3.    Cited another celebrity gossip website (in this case OK Magazine) for their lies, perpetuating (that means making something continue indefinitely) the nonsense. FAIL

4.    Cited another celebrity gossip website(The Mirror) for some more lies.  FAIL

5.    Claimed that two different unnamed sources (OK’s and the Mirror’s) so-calledly knew something about their lives (where they want to move).  Even ascribing quotes to Rob and Kristen.  DOUBLE FAIL

6.    Continued to feed the beast and make people stupid with endless drivel. (that means drool or nonsense)  FAIL

7.    You are still “working”, which means you haven’t been fired yet.   FAIL

8.    Respected the privacy of actors who expressly want to be left alone?   DOUBLE FAIL

9.    Tossed in yet another story about Rob’s family and the paparazzi ruining their plans to move to London and how Rob’s family gave her a hard time.  DOUBLE FAIL.

10.    But better still, when you hit the link to “but gave Rob a hard time for reconciling with Kristen” in your story, it takes you to a earlier Hollywood Life Exclusive story about how Kristen’s friend told HL that “They (Kristen and Rob’s family including his two sisters) are all back on really good terms — even better than before.”  Wow. Its hard to keep those links in order when you lie so much, isn’t it Chris.

And perhaps worst of all, you had to go ahead and mention that so-called “cheating scandal” again. TRIPLE FAIL  Still haven’t read the Grand Punk at justiceforkristen.wordpress.com have you.

AND YOU WONDER WHY WE ARE HAVING TRUST ISSUES WITH YOU AND BONNIE?

Just to summarize, where are they going to move?  London? Paris? NYC? To his house in LA? Her house in LA? On the Isle of Wight?  Or to Australia, perhaps? You at HL have said them all except the last one, at one time or another.  No wonder Rob and Kristen have a team on it, they need one to manage all of these international house buying plans.

And back in September when Paris Fashion week was going on, were they reconciled? Not talking to each other? Trying to work it out?  Or trying to have a baby?  You at HL have said them all at one time or another as well.  And how do gush to someone who you are not talking to?

But this quote, “Kristen’s got this wonderful vision of a 1920s-decorated place with lacy lamps and an old piano in the corner. It’s exactly what they both want in life — solitude and a quiet creative space.” Yeah right.  That’s really special.  That’s really over the top, even for you Chris.

The Hollywood Lies article:

Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart Are Moving To Paris — Report

go to their website if you must.

 

Another Kristen Stewart Article Worth Reading!

Honor Roll 2012: Kristen Stewart Goes ‘On the Road’ to Find Sex, Dancing and — Just Maybe — an Award

by Jay A. Fernandez
December 20, 2012 12:44 PM   As seen on Indiewire

Kristen Stewart in “On the Road” Comme au Cinema

Honor Roll is a daily series for December that will feature new or previously published interviews, profiles and first-person stories of some of the year’s most notable cinematic voices. Today, we’re running a new interview with Kristen Stewart.

It’s easy for audiences to forget that if you take away “Twilight,” Kristen Stewart has done mostly indie-minded acting work. Other studio films do pepper her resume — “Jumper,” “Snow White and the Huntsman,” “Panic Room,” “Zathura” — but at a mere 22-years-old, Stewart has an independent streak at least as deep as that of well-respected indie darlings such as Michelle Williams and Catherine Keener. It’s just that much of Stewart’s public approbation has come from the Teen Choice/MTV Movie Award constituencies.

That may change this year.

To read the rest of this article click here.

Thank you, Andrew O’Hehir of SALON!!!

Kristen Stewart: Not just “the ‘Twilight’ girl everyone s- – – – on”

The “Twilight” star talks about media insanity, her unbelievable career arc and her role in “On the Road”

By

AndrewOhehir_Bio

December 18, 2012  in SALON

Kristen Stewart: Not just Kristen Stewart (Credit: AP/Jordan Strauss)

I met Kristen Stewart somewhat unexpectedly. And I really liked her! I mean, she’s a cagey, cautious person; you can feel her sizing you up while she decides whether you’re an idiot or a nutjob and discerns how much she should stick to polite, neutral remarks. You might be like that, too, if you were 22 years old and the highest-paid actress in the history of Hollywood, and if you had seen an ordinary domestic spat with your boyfriend – the sort of thing a whole lot of 22-year-olds go through, if I remember correctly – become an international front-page tabloid story.

I did not ask her anything about Robert Pattinson or the current state of her love life. Because it’s not my business, and I really don’t care! So if that’s what you want to read, you might have to look elsewhere. But even in a brief and necessarily superficial conversation, I got a few flashes of real personality: Stewart is a young woman with a mischievous wit and a penchant for murmured, foul-mouthed asides who is enthusiastic about her work and also aware that her rocket-like ascension from the little-known indie ingénue of “Into the Wild” and “Adventureland” to a huge superstar has been an incredibly strange story.

Earlier this week, the virgin-turned-vampire of the just-concluded “Twilight” series was in New York for the premiere of a vastly different sort of film: the long-brewing adaptation of Jack Kerouac’s “On the Road” from Brazilian director Walter Salles (of “The Motorcycle Diaries”). A passion project that Salles has been working on for five years – and which he inherited from Francis Ford Coppola, who once hoped to make the film with Brad Pitt and Ethan Hawke in the starring roles – this “On the Road” is decidedly a mixed bag, visually lovely and packed full of music and atmosphere, but only sometimes capturing the syncopated, drug-fueled effervescence of Kerouac’s prose.

Stewart has been working hard to promote the film since its Cannes premiere in May, which is remarkable considering that she plays a supporting role and that it seems unlikely “On the Road” will attract much of a mainstream audience. (Her scenes were actually filmed more than two years ago, just before she shot the next-to-last “Twilight” film.) Her character, known as Marylou in the book and movie, is based on a real person named Luanne Henderson, who was the on-and-off partner of Kerouac’s charismatic, bisexual pal Neal Cassady, who became Dean Moriarty in “On the Road.” (Dean is played by Garrett Hedlund in this movie’s real star-making performance.)

One of the virtues of Stewart’s post-“Twilight” position, as she reflected in our conversation, is that she gets to do whatever she damn well pleases in a business and an era where most working actors have limited choices. She may or may not return to the role of Snow White in a sequel to the darkish fantasy “Snow White and the Huntsman,” and although she’s been cast opposite Ben Affleck in a screwball comedy for “Crazy, Stupid, Love” creators Glenn Ficarra and John Requa, that movie hasn’t begun production. In the meantime, her publicists suggested (with about 12 hours’ notice) that she might be willing to chat for a few minutes in her New York hotel before the “On the Road” premiere.

Although she was photographed later that night in a lacy, sheer and leggy designer dress and alarmingly high pumps, when I met Stewart she was dressed more anonymously, almost tomboyishly, in a pinstripe shirt, tan pullover and slim-fitting blue jeans.

For the Q and A portion of this article  click here.

Meet Another Face of the Celebrity Gossip Machine: Meet USA Today’s Andrea Mandell

By twilighter

Previously we highlighted several unsavory perveyors of the Celebrity Gossip Machine and how they distorted the truth to generate web hits and sell their sleazy magazines.   But every once and a while you actually run across someone in the entertainment reporting business who actually resists the urge of her colleagues to use  deception and demagoguery to make money.

Meet Andrea Mandell, the USA Today entertainment reporter.

Image

Andrea penned an article today on Kristen Stewart’s appearance at the premier of On the Road yesterday in LA and managed to write a whole web article about the premier and Stewart’s comments in relation to it without once mentioning the so called “cheating” scandal.  Good for her.  Nearly all of the rest of her colleagues that purport to be reporters can’t seem to write anything about Kristen, let alone Robert Pattinson, without mentioning it, even when it has nothing to do with what they are writing about.

You can read Mandell’s article, which is actually enlightening at:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2012/11/04/stewart-steps-out-with-pattinson-for-on-the-road/1680141/

If you follow her tweets on twitter you will also note that she never tweeted anything regarding the so called scandal at all.

And in the web article’s side panel, there is actually a link to send her an email. I think we should encourage these rare acts of media responsibility, so if you have a moment, drop Andrea an email and tell her that you appreciate her unwillingness to sink to the gutter and pile on like so many of her colleagues have and that she should be commended for it.  Its not often that we get a chance to commend someone for doing a good job in this business.

Gotta say “I Like This Video!”

Are You Living in a Dreamworld?

You know, until all this (the “scandal”) happened, I didn’t really know much about photo manipulation.  I mean, I knew that it was used in magazines to make models appear thinner, have perfect skin etc.  And of course, it has been used by the movie industry for years.  If you read the previous article you get a small idea of some of the amazing special effects that were used on Snow White and Huntsman.  It is often called CGI or Computer Generated Imagery.

Wikipedia says:

Computer-generated imagery (CGI) is the application of computer graphics to create or contribute to images in art, printed media, video games, films, television programs, commercials, simulators and simulation generally. The visual scenes may be dynamic or static, and may be 2D or 3D, though the term “CGI” is most commonly used to refer to 3D computer graphics used for creating scenes or special effects in films and television.

Those special effects have become a standard in the industry.  Think about some of the most popular movies around today.  The Avengers, Batman (in all its many forms), Ironman, Transformers…the list goes on and on.  You would be hard put to try to find a movie that DOESN’T have some sort of CGI effect in it.

But, it had never really occurred to me that it could be used in other ways.   As I have followed the “scandal”, I have learned that photo manipulation is not only possible in the film industry, but is easily done by anyone with a computer and  the right software.  Did you know that if you Google “change heads photoshop” you will get 10 choices before you even go a page to choose an article.  I was shocked!  Did you also know there is even an APP for it?  It’s called  “iSwapFaces”!  ANYBODY can do it with the right tools.

They have tutorials on how to do it.  Check this out!

<—-This can be made into this—->

in NINE easy steps!!!!

Check it out for yourself:       http://tutorials-photoshop.com/photo-editing/change-heads1/

You can even find a video to show you how to do it!  Type change heads photoshop into Yahoo! and you will get multiple videos of what can be done and how to do it!

We even have examples on the blog—done by individuals—mostly for fun.  For instance, have you checked out the Ruperv Bashing section of this blog?  Take a look at the 50 Ways to Kill a Ruperv page.  Do you think any of those events ever actually occurred?  Of course not!  They never occurred, not only that, some of them aren’t even possible.  Ruperv being eaten by a troll?  Heck the troll was not even real to start with! That was all done with photo manipulation.  A manipulation of a manipulation.  Whoa!  Now that’s a concept!

About.com’s article entitled The Ethics of Digital Photo Manipulation  in part states:

Doctoring photographs has been around almost as long as photography itself, but as digital imaging hardware and software has both advanced and come down in price, the practice of digital image manipulation has become much more commonplace and faked photos are becoming harder to detect. In fact, digital photo manipulation — commonly referred to as ‘photoshopping’ — has recently become a popular pastime, and many consider this photographic fakery to be a new art form. But when it works its way into photojournalism and the media, the issue of ethics comes to the forefront. How far can we take digital image manipulation and still maintain photographic integrity

There is a Code of Ethics for Digital Manipulation:

Digital Manipulation Code of Ethics

NPPA Statement of Principle

  • Approved by the NPPA executive committee Nov. 12, 1990, in Tempe, Arizona.
  • Revised by the NPPA Board of Directors July 3, 1991, in Washington, D.C.
  • Incorporated into the NPPA Bylaws at the 50th Anniversary NPPA Convention in Washington, D.C., in June 1995, as part of Article XVII, Section C, the NPPA Code of Ethics.

adopted 1991 by the NPPA Board of Directors

As journalists we believe the guiding principle of our profession is accuracy; therefore, we believe it is wrong to alter the content of a photograph in any way that deceives the public.

As photojournalists, we have the responsibility to document society and to preserve its images as a matter of historical record. It is clear that the emerging electronic technologies provide new challenges to the integrity of photographic images … in light of this, we the National Press Photographers Association, reaffirm the basis of our ethics: Accurate representation is the benchmark of our profession. We believe photojournalistic guidelines for fair and accurate reporting should be the criteria for judging what may be done electronically to a photograph. Altering the editorial content … is a breach of the ethical standards recognized by the NPPA.

Digital manipulation of photographs is happening ALL the time.  I also realize to refer to the people of FlameFlyNet Pictures as true journalists that could be held to a Code of Ethics, is unrealistic.  But, if you think that the photographs of Kristen Stewart at the lookout point with Rupert couldn’t have been altered….you are living in a dream world.


Huntsman: Every trick in the fairy tale book

Article Written by Ian Failes  June 6, 2012 in fxguide

See the original article on fxguide

From face replacements to shattering soldiers, from CG trolls to magic metallic mirrors, Snow White and the Huntsman uses an incredible and diverse range of visual effects to re-tell the classic fairytale. fxguide has interviews with all the lead vendors – Double Negative, Rhythm & Hues, Pixomondo, Lola, The Mill, Hydraulx, Baseblack, BlueBolt and Nvizage, plus overall visual effects supervisor Cedric Nicolas-Troyan.

Working together with co-visual effects supervisor Phil Brennan, Nicolas-Troyan co-ordinated a wide range of shot-types – 1300 in all – for director Rupert Sanders’ first feature film. “I think besides spaceships and exploding New York, we’ve done everything that’s in the visual effects book!,” he jokes. “We’ve done creatures, transformations, animals and plants, buildings, fire and so much stuff. Cloth simulations, liquid metal, dynamics, face replacements. You name it – it’s somewhere in the movie.”

The film tells the story of Queen Raveena’s (Charlize Theron) dark rule after she has imprisoned Snow White (Kristen Stewart), until White teams up with The Huntsman (Chris Hemsworth). Some of the overriding principles for the visual effects work were the ideas of the Queen being ‘death’ and Snow White being ‘life’. “For example,” says Nicolas-Troyan, “we wanted these dark soldiers in the film to break like obsidian shards, which matches the Dark Fairy at the end of the movie. So it was an iteration of something else. When the Queen breaks into ravens they are dark and shiny. The ravens fall into a puddle of black oil and then she comes out of that. Everything has that type of look to it. It also transferred to her actual wardrobe – her crown and the suit of armor at the end.”

Attack of the Troll

Rhythm & Hues created the troll.

A signature sequence in the film involves a troll and its encounter with the Huntsman and Snow White near a bridge, with visual effects by Rhythm & Hues. Nvizage previs’d the scene and acquired mocap for the troll (see below). On set, production filmed without any troll stand-in but used eyeline poles and air canons for interaction, including for watery splashes. “I was holding a tennis ball on a pole in front of Kristen,” says Nicolas-Troyan. “I knew when the troll was grunting and roaring. I was giving Kristen a cue so she knew what it would be doing at any given time. She did a great job because there was not much there to look at.”

Although Rhythm used some mocap for the body motion, all facial work was hand-animated, with the rest of the troll’s body made up of root-like muscles and a coarse skin texture. “The skin had to feel like different callus’ had developed on it,” says Rhythm visual effects supervisor Todd Shifflett, “and that they would read more like different roots and rocks that he had developed.”

Download Video

Watch a scene from the troll attack.

The studio also created scores of creatures and plant life for the film, including many that populate the woods. There was a mystical stag, a badger, a fox, squirrels, rabbits, hedgehogs, birds, mushrooms, a snake made of moss, butterflies, the tortoise, scarabs which glow in the dark, ferns and even fairies. The fairies, in particular, were inspired by the director’s wish that they be child-like. “Rupert wanted them to be kids,” explains Nicolas-Troyan. “The fairies come out of the animals in the woods, basically. They were like eight inches tall. We were going to make them asexual so they could be naked, with deer eyes and bigger eyes and covered with a little bit of hair, and have iridescent skin, with white peach fuzz on them. They ended up having the features of two kids who were mo-capped for their faces and expressions. The body was mo-capped from two girls who were dancers. They had a graceful feel to them.”

The mystical stag.

Another of Rhythm’s visual effects contributions were the dark birds, seen when Ravenna transforms and also after she has been in battle. The studio relied on some flock animation software but was also able to adapt the birds to perform specific motions. “It was a little bit morbid in one whole section where there are some dying crows,” recalls Shifflett. “After the Queen is in a fight and has to go back to the castle to re-generate herself, the crows slam into the ground, and a lot break their necks. You’d be shocked and amazed of how much YouTube footage there is of real birds dying – disturbing but of course we had to use that as reference.”

The Mill’s Mirror Man

The Queen asks the famous question, ‘Who is the fairest of them all?’ to a metallic and liquidy Mirror Man which emerges from her wall. The Mill, under visual effects supervisor Nicolas Hernandez, completed the shots of the being coming out of the wall, dribbling along the floor and into a humanoid hooded figure. “Rupert had seen a sculpture by Kevin Francis Gray called Face-Off,” says Nicolas-Troyan. “He reached out to him and asked if he might re-design it for the movie and he did! We scanned that and The Mill started working on it. The tricky part was how was he going to come out of the mirror?”

Download Video

Watch The Mill’s behind the scenes video for Mirror Man.

After determining that some early looks seemed a little too close to Terminator 2, “we thought more about cloth,” recalls Nicolas-Troyan. “What about trying to make it look like pulling a veil of silk? So that’s what The Mill started to work with and doing a cloth sim with a liquidy feel. That was very successful and made it very different from T2 and more delicate and less alien.”

On set, Theron acted against a crude prop version of the Mirror Man with a mirror surface. Inside, production hid a RED EPIC camera turned sideways that gave a full 5K head to toe image of the actress to be comp’d in later. “Then behind the stage we hooked up a mic and some speakers,” adds Nicolas-Troyan,” and the voice of Mirror Man was there looking at Charlize on the monitor and talking to her.”

The Mill created the Mirror Man.

“We organized a studio shoot to film a lot of liquids in slow motion to study the right look,” says Hernandez about The Mill’s approach to the fluid and cloth sims. “We had the Phantom camera and did a lot of tests with fabric, paint and corn starch on a speaker. Cedric pointed to what he liked. He wanted really slow but in normal speed. We did a lot of tests but stepped away from it once we went with the cloth look.”

As the liquidy form of the magical creation stops on the floor, it rises up into the solid figure. The Mill used Maya nCloth with many custom forces for the final look of Mirror Man upright, and to control the cloth shape and motion. “On top of that we used Houdini to add a layer of fluid deformation – we’d bend the edges to control the shapes,” adds Hernandez. “To control the performance we added subtle shoulder movement, added some breathing and tried to make him more human than just a statue.”

To comp the reflection obtained with the RED EPIC, The Mill had to cheat the look of Theron to ensure she was readable. “We also developed a shader for the Mirror Man that had a lot of different blur reflections, oxidations and little scratches as little layers,” explains Hernandez.

Replacing faces: the dwarfs

The Huntsman’s dwarfs were played by full-sized actors, including Nick Frost and Ray Winstone. Production used both old-school and digital techniques to help achieve their unique look. “There was the good old trick of everybody raised up first,” says Nicolas-Troyan. “We built platforms to make it work for those types of shots. Kristen and Chris would walk on risers and everybody else would walk on the ground. We used wide lenses and gave a lot of head space when we shot the dwarves so all of a sudden they look really small. It was very challenging to do say Ray Winstone next to Kristen Stewart as you have to make Ray look like he’s 4’11′. But if you look at old movies, they were doing that type of stuff and they didn’t have CG.”

The Huntsman and the dwarves.

Other shots required motion control or greenscreen shoots where arms and limbs would be removed or reduced in size. Body doubles were also used. “The most important part of all of that was the research prior to the shoot – I researched dwarfism,” notes Nicolas-Troyan. “Besides their shorter limbs, the selling point from an acting point of view is the way they walk. I found out that the center of gravity of a little person – they offset their center of gravity left and right but full-size people offset it forward and backward. So what makes the trick is the wobble that dwarves have when they walk.”

The visual effects supervisor created a test – both as a still image and then as a short video – to show to producers to convince them of the on-set and VFX techniques. “And we also cast dwarf doubles who were actually proportionate dwarf doubles who could do exactly what a full grown person could do,” says Nicolas-Troyan. “We paired them with our actors and we sent them to our dwarf camp. They actually learned how to wobble together and had the same style of wobbling. So when you cut from one to another, you buy it.”

Lola VFX and Rhythm & Hues both contributed dwarf shots to the film, with Lola initially adopting a similar approach to their previous work in face replacements. “On the surface,” says Lola visual effects supervisor Edson Williams, “the work was very challenging, but we had developed a technique on Social Network that should serve us well.”

Lola’s approach to the dwarf shots was to utilize face projections. “We developed the face projection technique on Social Network to project Army Hammer’s facial performance onto the body doubles face,” explains Williams. “This allowed ‘twins’ to interact in new ways and the twins were even able to row a boat together. The face projection technique was a perfect fit for Snow White because you can shoot principal photography first, then once an edit is locked, you re-shoot the hero actors performance in a controlled environment. Face projection starts by 3D tracking (Pftrack) the body double’s face, then carefully analyzing the lighting changes on the face of the double. The next step is to pre-program these lighting changes into the computer controlled lighting dome, this is done with DMX lights and software.”

Download Video


Watch a featurette on the dwarves.

“Once the original scene lighting is programmed into the dome, we bring in the hero actor,” continues Williams. “The hero actor sits in a stationary chair (with slight head restraint) and recreates the performance that is being played back on a reference monitor. The recreated performance is recorded with four RED EPIC cameras placed strategically around the dome. The final step involves projecting the RED footage back onto a cyberscan of the hero actor’s face that has been 3D tracked back into the original scene.”

Williams admits that the dwarfs were much more of a challenge than the twins in Social Network. “In Snow White,” he says, “the goal was to get as many shots in camera as possible. To facilitate this, the hero actors had their heads re-created as latex masks, the masks were then placed over the body doubles heads with only the eyes and mouth of the double showing through. Unfortunately for Lola, when you stretch a latex mask of the hero actors head over the body double’s head, the proportions of the mask are greatly distorted. Initially we only replaced the front facial area of the double, and utilized the latex mask for the rest of the head. The test did not look good, and we had to develop new tricks to correct the problems. We began to 3D track the masked body double with a cyberscan of the hero actor, and then using the cyberscan’s proportions we would deform the masked head back to its proper shape. Once the masked double was close to human proportions, we began our face projections again, but we included much more of the hero actors performance, including the ears, neck and hairline.”

Dneg’s Dark Forest and Dark Fairies

Double Negative, under visual effects supervisor John Moffatt, orchestrated an elaborate collection of forest animals and creatures for the Dark Forest, including twisted trees and branches, a bat creature, oozing muscles, beetles and butterflies. For a climatic sequence, Dneg also created the Dark Fairies conjured by the queen when Snow White and co attack the castle. Made up of obsidian shard-like elements, the Fairies are humanoid in shape and move quickly against their opponents.


Watch the Dark Fairy sequence.

The actors performed sword swings against air, while Dneg crew gathered textures and lighting reference and witness cam views of the takes. Various stunts were also carried out on set. Back at Dneg, the shots and the movements of actors and stunt doubles were matchmoved and wires and body harnesses cleaned up.

The Dark Fairies were made up of 30,000 shards – the set-up began with an animation rig of the creature to block out actions. Animation was brought into Houdini, and a Dneg FX toolset – including an in-house tool called Bang that embeds the Bullet physics solver within Houdini’s SOP – let artists choreograph the movement of the Fairies as well as allowing shards to detach or move about in specific ways. Each shard was able to be extracted to a point cloud, and then relied on point instancing at render time.

To hear more about Dneg’s Dark Fairies, fxinsider members can watch a video interview with visual effects supervisor John Moffatt below.

Soldier shards

Wireframe view of the shattering soldier.

Final shot.

Pixomondo aided in bringing to life the battles seen in Huntsman, including a battle between the Dark Army and the knights, overseen by visual effects supervisor Bryan Hirota. A key feature of the dark army is that they shatter on impact into black shards – as discussed above this is a pre-cursor to the obsidian Dark Fairies. “In some shots they had knights in place that would get struck and would fall, others we painted knights on top of them and just dealt with with paint-outs,” says Pixomondo visual effects producer BJ Farmer. “For others we added knights in the frame when they weren’t there at all.”

Pixomondo relied on 3ds Max, V-Ray and Thinking Particles to achieve the look of the shattering soldiers. “It took us a while to arrive at the fragmentation,” notes Pixomondo digital effects supervisor Andrew Roberts. “Should they be whispy? Smokey? We tried some ink effects and something more fluid, and ended up with the obsidian look. Each of the fragments had to appear as shards and be sharp and dangerous looking.”

“We would try pre-fragmenting him and then shatter the soldiers,” adds Roberts, “but then it would just feel like a CG effect as if he’s frozen and falls apart. But Thinking Particles allowed us to set up a volume break system where based on the match moved sword and the angle and velocity that the sword hit the surface, it would just dynamically break whilst the knight continued to animate, and have that fragmentation go all through the body. For the trailer shot, we had over 130,000 fragments contributing to that dynamic sim.”

“A good portion of it was procedural, but our FX TD put in some control so you could specify the time when certain limbs would shatter and then various vector nodes to direct which direction those shards would actually fly. Sometimes we would even hand animate certain fragments – for the hero trailer shot Cedric wanted a fragment to fill frame right at the end, so that was one that had to be hand-animated.”

In terms of compositing, one of the biggest challenges was to make the CG soldiers look the same as the live action men around them. “The guys did a great job of matching that with Nuke,” says Pixomondo compositing supervisor Randy Brown. “We could paint and project something onto them, and then that wouldn’t shatter so we would have to transition into the shattering render.”

Pixomondo also worked on army shots.

Pixomondo also created grand army scenes for sequences on the beach and in the forest. “In one shot,” notes Brown, “we had an original plate shot from a helicopter. It’s basically just the battlefield of the black army standing there and then the white army riding up to them. On set they just had the first two rows and then the back row was horses – the rest was a rectangle we would fill in later. We went back and forth on which shots would work. They also wanted the ground to look more scorched and added some netting they had used to cover some fauna. Then we had to get rid of ground the white army was riding up on. They had some fire elements too. Then there was a camera car we had to get rid of. Eventually we ended up getting rid of almost all of the plate.”

“For the further away helicopter shot we had a lot of cards set up with 2D pyro on them and smoke elements,” adds Brown. “But when the camera’s over the top, the cards were just flat and didn’t work, so those elements had to be rendered in camera specifically for that shot.”

Pixomondo used both Massive and a targeted hand-animation approach to achieve some of these army shots. “We looked at Massive to drive those actions, but we needed very specific control over each of the knights,” he says. “So after the shot was match moved we did an object track of each of the silver knights and their swords, so we’d have the correct sword swings. Then we had a small group of talented animators that hand-animated 300 unique characters ducking and defending themselves, and that worked out really well.”


Watch a featurette on one of the film’s battles.

“The overall army was made up of 1500 knights and so for the surrounding army we had a series of scripts that would randomly select animation clips from a 1000 frame master source and then it would apply that animation to the knights that weren’t directly affected in the battle, and distribute them over the Lidar’d terrain at a random scale and rotation, so that it all felt unique. Then we could also render out some unique character IDs so we could color-correct them and adjust their luminance and hue just slightly.” Additional pyro elements for torches and fireballs were created in FumeFX and Krakatoa, with Thinking Particles and Krakatoa used to disintegrate the hair of the knights. For one of the castle attack scenes on the beach, horse agents inside Massive were exported as .obj objects for their hoove elements, then brought into 3ds Max to trigger particle splashes.

“One shot I really liked working on,” says Roberts, “was right towards the end of the prologue when the King has his foot on the helmet of decapitated Dark Knight and as he moves his foot forward over it and rolls it. It crumbles and disintegrates. They shot a live action helmet and then we match moved that and painted it out from the plate and used Thinking Particles to do a progression of fragmentation. It had the knight’s brains spilling out but it was this obsidian look so doesn’t actually look gory.”

Snow White set extensions

The castle.

Various set extensions for the film were carried out by Baseblack and BlueBolt.

BlueBolt crafted scenes of Snow White’s castle and the royal village, with supervision by Angela Barson. “The village was partially built to a certain level and then we set extended it up with additional streets,” says Barson. “The castle was a very small set built at Pinewood in a courtyard and then extended. We had to do the castle and the village in multiple states, so it starts off in the Magnus reign which is all pristine and happy, nice colors and everything and then go through the Ravenna reign which is in disrepair and has veins done in SpeedTree growing over all of it, and holes everywhere, much more grunge-y and dirty and dark.”

The castle, situated on an island off the coast, was a full 3D build in Maya and textured in Mari. “There are helicopter plates and battle scenes there shot in Wales,” notes Barson. “We had a Lidar of the coastline but not really much of the island itself. There were no distinctive points to lock onto. Every time we matchmoved a shot, that fed into information for the other shots.”


Original plate.

Final shot.


Then, the village also featured in two reigns, including in a dark and stormy setting that required tricky bluescreen rain keys and additional digital precipitation. Plates for the village were shot at Pinewood with only a partial set. “We also had a lot of snowy shots so we had to add snow atmospherics to the castle – some CG snow with live action, and lots of smoke,” recalls Barson.

Baseblack’s first sequence was for the prologue, which covers the marriage of Ravenna. Production shot on a minimal set with greenscreen backing, and then extended the area. “The started off asking us to reference Durham Cathedral, which is where they wanted to shoot,” says VFX supervisor Steve Moncur, who headed up the work with Rudi Holzapfel. “But the costs associated with hiring the cathedral were going to be astronomical.” The cathedral was scanned and photographed, but access was only granted at night. Baseblack added crowds and put in new roof beams and back walls in proxy geometry, plus atmosphere, and then used Nuke to project shot elements into the existing plates. The studio also worked on the epilogue cathedral shots.

Other Baseblack sequences included shots for castle of Duke Hammond, which involved extensions to partial courtyard sets filmed at Pinewood, matching the half-built walls and adding some smoke and movement into the plates. One shot featured horses exiting the castle entrance, filmed only with a minor frontage and with greenscreen backing. Shots from various angles, including smaller comps at ground level, relied on a topographical map to ensure consistency and use one asset set-up.

“We also did some distance shots of the castle,” adds Moncur, “based on plates shot in Wales. For a procession sequence that we shared with R&H, since they were doing face replacements, we had to lower the hillside, add paths, add in shot elements.” Other contributions from Baseblack included exterior views looking out from castles, a helicopter fly-over – requiring a 2,000 frame track, a CG castle and a custom-built collection of different mountainous landscapes from live action elements and work in Terragen.

Queen on fire

Hydraulx, under visual effects supervisor Colin Strause, completed shots of the Queen burning towards the end of the movie, relying on CG fire and a CG face replacement. There was also a full 3D transition shot from Prince William to the Queen, and several volumetric fog and CG sword extensions during the film.

For the Prince William transition, laser scans of the actors were used to build digital versions of the characters, using an inbetween morph character with no face (no nose or mouth) and then relying on cloth and hair sims before rendering out in Mental Ray. For the burning Queen Ravenna sequence, Theron was filmed with interactive lighting, then small tracking dots were painted on her face and neck. Using a laser scan and the dot data, Hydraulx rigged an animated model of the Queen’s skin and muscles. A Mental Ray shader allowed them to blister the skin and reveal burnt muscles underneath, with comp’d in practical and CG fire and heat distortion.

Previs’ing Huntsman

Previs by Nvizage.

Previs by Nvizage.

Nvizage began previs for the film by modeling the main sets such as Ravenna’s castle and the royal village. The studio relied on its OptiTrack Insight virtual camera system (VCS), a system that enabled production to establish set builds and lens sizes before shooting. The VCS was used for two battle scenes, the troll bridge encounter, various helicopter shots and other sequences inside the castle. (Halon Entertainment also provided previs services).

“The VCS could be operated as a hand held camera or as car or heli mounted camera depending on what was required,” notes Nvizage in its press materials. “Our system allowed us to easily adjust the speed of the camera in the virtual environment, as well as automatically smooth out accidental bumps and jolts. One of the favored methods of shooting by the DOP was using a wheeled swivel chair, that way he could create steady camera moves whilst using the chair to take some of the weight of the camera.”

Nicolas-Troyan acted out the mocap for the troll sequence. “This animation was incorporated into the sequence along with existing animation for Snow White and the Huntsman. The sequence was long and complex, so we broke it down into four parts, allowing us to work concurently working the VCS and generating the animation content. Upon completion of this sequence we provided scene diagrams of the Trolls steps and hand impact points to give to SFX, quicktime schematics and technical plans showing camera moves in relation to actors and set.”

All images copyright 2012 Universal Pictures.

Robsten is Forever!

Image